[Rails] (Online) documentation for 1.0

[Rick Bradley]

* Johan S?rensen (johans at gmail.com) [050310 09:03]:
> (All of those is currently intervened between the wiki, the hierki
> manuals and the various READMEs. Collecting those, and keeping them up
> to date would be a fair amount of work, but beneficial to users)
> * Method/class reference, not much unlike rails.rubyonrails.com is
> today, but with searching abilities etc (I guess that goes for
> everything)
> 
> Or is the general consensus that what is currently there is "good enough"?

On the contrary, while Rails documentation is better than most open
source projects' documentation, I personally think you're on the right
track here.

Rick
-- 
 http://www.rickbradley.com    MUPRN: 61
                       |  attempt to bridge part
   random email haiku  |  of the beginning of the
                       |  gap fail with loki.